Email Marc

Blog Tags


Archives

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

NAHL Meetings Review

Okay... in order, here's my take on the NAHL public decisions from this weekend:

1) The Board approved the relocation of Helena Bighorns to Taylor, Michigan, for the 2006-07 season.

The Helena-to-Taylor (not Troy, as was misreported by some media over the weekend) move was not breaking news by most standards, as this was expected as part of the Great Montana Defection to the AWHL. However, by all accounts the sale and relocation are not complete.

2) The Board granted inactive membership status to the Cleveland Barons for the 2006-07 season.

No surprise here, since the Barons have been unable to find an owner willing to keep the team in Cleveland.

3) The Board accepted the voluntary termination of the Billings Bulls effective immediately.

I'm not sure why Billings decided to roll over on this one. Perhaps, with all the efforts to ensure a rink to play in and the move to the AWHL, Strong and Bonanno didn't feel like trying to find a buyer and market to which peddle their NAHL franchise rights. The events of last summer, with Santa Fe being sold at $50k below expansion fee cost and the Soo Indians voluntarily forfeiting their rights, suggests that there were too many franchises chasing too few viable and/or willing markets then, and that the glut remains a problem in the NAHL today.

4) The Board approved the transfer of ownership of the Santa Fe Roadrunners to Mary Magdalene Lorang.

The sale took place several months ago and was made public locally, but the news didn't travel far. For those who insist this is a precursor to the Roadrunners relocating again, bear in mind that Mary Magdalene Lorang is a Santa Fe local, and it's quite rare for a local to buy a team then immediately move it.

5) The Board approved the transfer of ownership of the Wasilla Spirit to a group lead by Mark Lee.

No surprise here, as the sale was previously advertised and, like the 'Runners sale, just needed a final sign off by the league.

6) Due to these movements, the divisional alignment for the 2006-07 season has yet to be determined.

We're not going to know who is left standing where until the teams are all sanctioned next month by the Junior Council. However, I expect Bozeman to vacate the league as part of the AWHL strategy. Word is some form of announcement about the Icedogs will be made Monday. Martel probably has the most to lose with his fans by defecting, so he needed the shoes to drop in Billings and Helena before he could justify the jump. I'm not faulting this, if it is indeed his strategy, but just laying it out there.

To continue... This places the Alaska teams at geographic risk once again, and at this point logic suggests moving them back to the South Division. Springfield will switch to the North (would someone please rename it the EAST Division?!???). The Central (should be NORTH) will remain relatively unchanged, although I suggest that Marquette be split from the North to 1) balance the three divisions at six teams each; and 2) be allowed extra interdivisional games against Alpena and Traverse City. This would make Marquette a swing team much the same way Springfield was this season between the North and South. I've already discussed the travel distances for Marquette, but for those who forgot, it's closer to Fargo, Alexandria, Owatonna, and Mason City than it is to Youngstown. So what I expect to see is the following:

EAST
Alpena
Mahoning Valley
Springfield
Downriver (Taylor)
Traverse City
USNTDP

SOUTH
Fairbanks
Santa Fe
Texarkana
Texas
Wasilla
Wichita Falls

NORTH
Bismarck
Fargo-Moorhead
Marquette
Minnesota
North Iowa
Southern Minnesota

I'm probably forgetting some little tidbit here or there... but most of you have plenty to digest here, so I'll call it a night.

Comments on "NAHL Meetings Review"

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (6:58 AM, May 18, 2006) : 

Marc. What do you hear of the other teams from the south not wanting to make the trip to Fairbanks? Rumor has it that the other teams are trying to block them out of the league.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (8:20 AM, May 18, 2006) : 

Would it make sense for the Alaska teams to also re-join the AWHL as they were previously?...and do you think that will eventually happen?

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (8:57 AM, May 18, 2006) : 

From another forum site it appears that the Alaska teams are happy about the Montana exodus as it's easier and cheaper for them to fly into Texas and Minnesota then to Montana for games.

I also believe they pay part of the costs of teams coming to Alaska.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (10:32 AM, May 18, 2006) : 

Marc,

It would be interesting to find out how much the average trip costs in it's division, then find out how much it costs to go to Alaska. I've heard they pay 8 or 9 grand and the Alaska teams pick up the rest.

If this is so (and it very well might not be), it can't be that much more considering they seem to play about five games up there every trip.

You could go one step further and figure the average cost /road game in the division and figure that with the Alaska teams.

Going by the number (I'll use 8500 because I'm not sure) above it would be about 1700 a game.

I'm curious to see what a trip from Texarkana to Sante Fe would run with Hotel, Bus and Driver, and Food. Does anybody now what these costs are roughly?

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (10:56 AM, May 18, 2006) : 

I think it would make more sense to swap the USNTDP team with the Marquette team. You can't even fly in or out of Marquette with a full team and equipment on a plane together, but you can out of Ann Arbor. The USNTDP has much more of OUR money and rich sponsers than Mqt will have. All of the teams in Mqt's division are 12+ hours away from them. That would be a brutal schedule.

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (12:49 PM, May 21, 2006) : 

Marc...

I dont see that realignment as the best possible outcome and here is why.

With Marquette being a new team, it is important for them to establish meaningful rivalries. All the east division teams are from michigan sans two. So, put marquette in the east. That way they can establish rivalries with TC and Alpena, both upstate teams. It will also make travel easier for the UPers.

Drop Springfield to the south, where they have been playing for the past couple years, keeping those southern rivalries intact.

Let Wasilla take Marquettes spot in the North. All the teams have a relatively close proximity to the Twin Cities, allowing travel expenses to still be do-able out of a major airport.

The only problem would be Fairbanks, but with Fairbanks and Wasilla playing a evenly distributed schedule across the league, it shouldn't matter what division they are in. Just make sure the two teams play each other enough to keep the bad blood.


The result would look like this:

EAST
Alpena
Mahoning Valley
Marquette
Downriver (Taylor)
Traverse City
USNTDP

SOUTH
Fairbanks
Santa Fe
Springfield
Texarkana
Texas
Wichita Falls

NORTH
Bismarck
Fargo-Moorhead
Minnesota
North Iowa
Southern Minnesota
Wasilla

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (10:23 AM, May 22, 2006) : 

Word out of Bozeman is that the rink was sold and will no longer be used as an ice facilty. Is this true? If so, will the Bozeman team just fold?

 

post a comment